Where Is Moonshine Rod Company Located?

Moonshine Rod is located in Charlottesville, Virginia, United States.

Where are moonshine rods manufactured?

Where Are Moonshine Fly Rods Made? – Moonshine has two main groups of fly rods. The first is their Series rods, including the Vesper, Drifter, Epiphany, Rambler, Revival, and Outcast. Depending on the specific model, these rods are assembled in either China or South Korea.

These are basically their standard factory rods. Moonshine assembles the Midnight Special rods in the US from both imported and US-made components. Check out their awesome videos where they turn the reel seat inserts and grips by hand. The Midnight Special rods are their custom shop range featuring unique cork grips and eye-catching reel seat inserts.

If you like the look of these rods, you’ll have to jump quick as they’re pieces of art that sell like hot fries. If you can’t find the one you’re looking for, make sure to revisit their site regularly as they frequently upload new models. There’s a misconception that rods, blanks, and components made in the East are of poor quality.

Where is Outlaw Rod company located?

Outlaw Rod Co. At Outlaw we’ve spent years perfecting our craft, exercising our passion, and stretching our limits to ensure we can deliver the very best rods on the market! From our hand turned reel seats to our better made blanks we create everything on our rods for a reason.

Are edge rods made in the USA?

Performance Features: Our USA made, NFC, hand-sanded, naked-graphite blanks, do not hide blemishes and are on average 20% lighter than their coated counterparts. All of our blanks are hand-sanded to avoid sanding into the fiber, damaging it and creating a weak spot.

Where is Shakespeare rods made?

Columbia, South Carolina, U.S.

What are moonshine rods made out of?

People Also Asked – Q: Does the Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod come with a case? A: Yes, the Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod does come with a compact case. It helps keep the rod safe from potential damagers, like dirt, moisture and sand. Q: What is the Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod made of? A: The Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod is made from premium graphite.

• The high durability of this material ensures longevity and a smooth fishing experience.
• Q: What weight and length options does the Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod come in? A: The Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod comes in three options.
• These are three-weight 10-foot 6-inch, two-weight 10-foot 4-inch, and four-weight 10-foot.

Q: How big is the tube of the Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod? A: This fishing rod’s tube is compact. It measures only 35 ⅞ inches. Q: How many guides does the Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod have? A: The Moonshine Rod Company Fly Fishing Rod has five guides. Drew Oritz is a commerce writer and editor. He likes to say that he grew up in the wild, which is partially true. He grew up in a farmhouse, surrounded by woods, fields, and a creek. Drew has spent much of his life outdoors and is excited to guide you through his never-ending list of the best products to keep you from falling into the perils of nature.

Where are Shimano rods made?

Millions of anglers worldwide use Shimano fishing reels, but not many seem to know where these reels are made or in what country Shimano is located. So I did some research and wrote up this article. Contrary to common belief, Shimano reels are not made in the USA but in Japan.

Where are Orvis rods made?

Tour the Orvis Rod Shop in Manchester, Vermont For all of us at Orvis, the words “Made in America” mean more today than they ever have. What they carry with them is an unwavering promise of quality, backed by over 150 years of sweat, innovation, passion, and pride.

Nowhere is that on display more prominently than in our Manchester, Vermont, Rod Shop, where our are conceived, constructed, tested, and ultimately perfected. From the state-of-the-art graphite technology used in our ® and ® rods to the time-tested Tonkin-cane construction of our series, each step in the process involves hard-working American hands and a powerful connection not only to our history, but to each and every rod we build.

While the finished product that leaves the shop may be a fly rod, at the end of the day, we realize that we’re building much more than that. Fly rods become bonds between family members. They become trusted travel companions. They become tangible memories of fish and people and places.

What proof is the best moonshine?

Is there 200 Proof Moonshine? – Contrary to what other people think, 200 proof moonshine exists. It’s probably the STRONGEST concentration, the HIGHEST PROOF of moonshine, and the HIGHEST PERCENTAGE of alcohol you’ll find out there. Though it doesn’t take the usual distilling process and simple tools to make this one.

• Instead, there’s a lot of complexities that go on to get this really strong drink.
• Would you dare drink a 200 proof moonshine? You’d probably say yes if you’re a daredevil.
• Drinking 200 proof moonshine is NOT OKAY.
• You’re practically drinking ethyl alcohol.
• Remember, 200 proof moonshine has 100% alcohol content contained on it.

Drinking it pure would seriously burn your throat, That being said, be careful with moonshines that have 150 plus final alcohol content. On average, 100 to 120 proof is pretty much the level people can comfortably drink their moonshine. Any more than that? That’s something else.

Does fly rod color matter?

Does Color Matter? Two Factors That Affect Your Fishing Experience The short answer is yes, your lure and fishing line color does matter. Although many an angler will disregard color when looking at prospective gear for their collection, the truth is that color has more of an impact on the fishing experience than people care to think about.

How strong is 40 proof moonshine?

How Strong is Moonshine? – The average alcohol by volume (ABV) of moonshine is 40%, although it can range from 60% to 80%. Because unskilled hands frequently manufacture moonshine, its alcohol concentration can vary widely and possibly reach dangerous levels. Alcohol’s freezing point, how it affects you when you drink it, and other factors are all affected by its alcohol level.

Brand	Size	Alcohol By Volume Level
Sugarlands Silver Cloud Tennessee Sour Mash Moonshine	750 ml	50%
Sugarlands Jim Tom Hedrick’s Unaged Rye	750 ml	50%
Sugarlands Appalachian Apple Pie Moonshine	750 ml	50%
Ole Smoky Blue Flame Moonshine	750 ml	64%
Saint Luna Charcoal Filtered Moonshine	750 ml	50%
Copperfish Cornish Moonshine	70 ml	40%
Ole Smoky White Lightnin’ Moonshine	750 ml	50%
Ole Smoky Apple Pie Moonshine	750 ml	20%
Sugarlands Root Beer Moonshine	750 ml	35%
Ole Smoky Peach Moonshine	750 ml	20%

Are Shakespeare rods made in China?

MAR-2-05 RR:TC:SM 560115 MLR Robert L. Eisen, Esq. Karen Bysiewicz, Esq. Coudert Brothers 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-7703 RE: Country of Origin Marking for Ugly Stik fishing rods; component parts; substantial transformation; multiple countries of origin Dear Mr.

1. Eisen and Ms.
2. Bysiewicz: This is in reference to your letters of October 4, November 20, 1996, and January 22, 1997, requesting a ruling on behalf of The Shakespeare Company (“Shakespeare”), concerning the country of origin marking for Ugly Stik fishing rods (“fishing rods”).
3. A meeting was held at the Office of Regulations & Rulings on January 14, 1997, and a sample was submitted at that time.

FACTS: It is stated that Shakespeare imports fishing rods from the People’s Republic of China (China), and that the fishing rods are assembled in China from component parts manufactured in various countries. The main components are stated to be as follows: (1) a U.S.-made fiberglass rod blank, measuring 5 « feet to 9 feet in length depending on the style; (2) line guides, made in Japan or Korea; and (3) a handle and reel seat made in various countries outside China.

The main assembly operations are stated to consist of: (1) thread wrapping the line guide components onto the rod, (2) epoxy encapsulating the thread, (3) fitting ferrules on some styles so that the rods may be broken into parts, and (4) affixing the handle and reel seat onto the rod. ISSUE: What is the country of origin of the fishing rod for marking purposes? LAW AND ANALYSIS: The marking statute, section 304, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign origin (or its container) imported into the U.S.

shall be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly and permanently as the nature of the article (or its container) will permit, in such a manner as to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the country of origin of the article.

Congressional intent in enacting 19 U.S.C.1304 was “that the ultimate purchaser should be able to know by an inspection of the marking on the imported goods the country of which the goods is the product. The evident purpose is to mark the goods so that at the time of purchase the ultimate purchaser may, by knowing where the goods were produced, be able to buy or refuse to buy them, if such marking should influence his will.” United States v.

Friedlaender & Co. Inc., 27 CCPA 297, 302, C.A.D.104 (1940). Part 134, Customs Regulations (19 CFR Part 134) implements the country of origin marking requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C.1304. Section 134.1(b), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 134.1(b)), defines “country of origin” as the country of manufacture, production or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the U.S.

Further work or material added to an article in another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to render such other country the “country of origin” within the meaning of the marking laws and regulations. For country of origin marking purposes, a substantial transformation of an imported article occurs when it is used in the U.S.

in manufacture, which results in an article having a name, character, or use differing from that of the imported article. See 19 CFR 134.35. In Headquarters Ruling Letter 559036, issued to Shakespeare on August 7, 1995, Customs concluded that analogous assembly operations performed in China did not result in a substantial transformation of the component parts of the fishing rods.

1. Customs determined that U.S.-made blanks, and foreign fishing lines, handles, and reel seats assembled into fishing rods in China did not create a new and different article of commerce, and that the name and use of the component parts did not change as a result of the assembly process.
2. Additionally, the assembly process was not found to be exceedingly complex.

However, since the fishing rods, made with U.S.-made blanks, were eligible for the partial duty exemption under subheading 9802.00.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), pursuant to 19 CFR 10.22 the country of origin of the fishing rods for marking purposes was “China”.

1. By T.D.96-48 (61 FR 28932, June 6, 1996), we note that 19 CFR 10.22 has been removed.
2. HRL 559036 referred to HRL 734214 dated November 18, 1991, where Customs held that fishing rods “(without reels)” assembled in China from Korean-origin fishing rods, foregrips, reel seats, butt grips, and line guides were not substantially transformed and the country of origin of the imported fishing rods was Korea, where the component parts were made.

HRL 559036 also referred to C.S.D.93-13 (May 26, 1992), where Customs considered the assembly of fishing rods in China from semi-finished Taiwanese rods and reel seats, Korean line guides, and Japanese paint In C.S.D.93-13, it was held that the assembly process did not result in the manufacture of a new and different article.

Accordingly, in C.S.D.93-13, it was determined that the imported fishing rods should be marked to indicate the country of origin of each of its component parts. However, it was also determined that in order for the marking to be conspicuous, it was acceptable to mark the fishing rod in a single centrally-located place denoting both the country where the article was assembled and the actual countries of origin from which the component parts were derived.

Additionally, the central marking did not have to specify the component’s particular country of origin. Therefore, the marking “Assembled in China from Components Manufactured in Taiwan, Korea, and China” was acceptable. We also note that by T.D.96-48, 19 CFR 134.43(e) was modified, which makes the term “Assembled in” an acceptable country of origin indicator, such that the marking allowed in C.S.D.93-13 is no longer acceptable.C.S.D.93-13 also cited T.D.67-173, 1 Cust.

1. Bull.366 (1967): In T.D.67-173,
2. We considered whether the domestic assembly of fishing rod parts, imported from only one foreign country, constituted a substantial transformation and found that it did not, stating that the assembly of all or substantially all of the components imported did not result in the manufacture of a new and different article.

Accordingly, we stated that one of the parts, such as the main reel housing, should be marked to indicate the country of origin, so that the marking remains legible and conspicuous after the reels were assembled. This determination was followed in 734214.

As no material differences exist between the present case and these earlier cases, we adhere to the position that the assembly of fishing rod components do not substantially transform the component parts. However, it appears that T.D.67-173 actually considered the assembly of two separate articles: (1) fishing rods and (2) fishing reels.

In regard to fishing rods, T.D.67-173 stated that for “fishing rods, complete except for handles, imported and permanently attached to handles made in the United States the Bureau is of the opinion that a manufacturer who produces fishing rods in such manner may be considered the ultimate purchaser of the imported rod parts.” Therefore, marking the end of the rod part which was to be attached to the handle was sufficient as it would remain visible until it reached the manufacturer.

In regard to fishing reels, T.D.67-173 stated that for “fishing reels imported in an unassembled or partially assembled condition and assembled in the United States, one of the parts, such as the main reel housing, should be marked to indicate the country of origin.” In this case, you state that the fishing rod imported into the U.S.

is classifiable under General Rule of Interpretation 1, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States. Accordingly, you claim that as the article is a fishing rod and not its minor parts, the fishing rod as a whole should be considered for country of origin marking purposes.

In this instance, you claim that since the fishing rod is made with a U.S.-origin rod blank, the finished fishing rod is not subject to the marking requirements of 19 U.S.C.1304, as the article is a product of the U.S. exported and returned and exempt from marking pursuant to 19 CFR 134.32(m), especially in light of the removal of 19 CFR 10.22.

As support that the fishing rod should not be subject to the marking requirements, you cite C.S.D.79-443 (January 25, 1979), where Customs considered knives produced in the U.S. and exported to Japan where the handles were exchanged with Japanese handles.

Upon return to the U.S., it was held that because the processing and addition of the handles in Japan did not result in a substantial transformation, the knives remained articles of the U.S. and, therefore, were not subject to the marking requirements of 19 U.S.C.1304. You note that in C.S.D.79-443, Customs did not require the knife handle to be marked with its own country of origin.

You also cite HRL 729519 dated May 18, 1988, where Customs ruled that imported wine coolers were exempt from country of origin marking. A flavor base of U.S. origin was sent to Canada, where it was mixed with water (and in some cases sugar) of Canadian origin.

• Customs held that no substantial transformation occurred in Canada, and that upon return to the U.S.
• The wine coolers were treated as U.S.
• Products exported and returned and exempt from marking pursuant to 19 CFR 134.32(m).
• Additionally, you contend that there are numerous instances where Customs has not required articles to be marked with the country of origin of their minor foreign components.

For example, you state that Customs has consistently held that the country of origin of a clock or watch is the country of manufacture of the watch or clock movement. Furthermore, you state that Customs has not required that the individual components of the watch or clock, such as the dial or hands, be marked with their individual countries of origin.

See HRL 735158 dated December 17, 1993, which held that the country of origin of a table clock was the country of manufacture of the clock movement because the movement constituted the “guts” of the watch or clock. In this case, as in HRL 735158, you contend that the rod blank is the “guts” of the completed fishing rod since the rod blank gives the completed fishing rod its shape and dimensions, determines its durability and its flexibility, and dictates how well and in what manner the rod will function.

See also HRL 560202 dated December 20, 1996, where Customs held that integrated circuits from Singapore and watch components from Japan and Hong Kong, combined with other Chinese components in China into finished LCD watches, had to be marked “Singapore” as Customs has long held that the origin of a watch or clock is the country of manufacture of the watch or clock movement.

Additionally, you cite HRL 733199 dated July 19, 1990, where Customs considered paint brushes manufactured in the Philippines from bristle heads and metal ferrules imported from China and brush handles made in the Philippines. Based upon Uniroyal, Inc.v. United States, 542 F. Supp.1026, (CIT 1982), where it was determined that imported uppers were the essence of a completed shoe, Customs determined that the operations in the Philippines did not result in a substantial transformation, but held that the country of origin of the paint brush was the country where the bristles were made.

It was stated that the imported bristles were the very essence of the finished product, and that the essential qualities of a paint brush are the type, diameter and qualities of the bristles. You also note that Customs did not require the origin of the handle to be marked to indicate its own country of origin, although its origin differed from the country of origin of the bristles.

• See also HRL 733804 dated November 9, 1990, which held that the assembly of an Italian-origin broom head onto a handle in the U.S.
• Did not result in a substantial transformation and the country of origin of the broom head was the country of origin for the completed broom whether it was assembled with a foreign or U.S.-made handle.

We note that The Encyclopedia Americana, Volume 11 at 324 (Int’l Ed.1980) indicates that fishing tackle consists of a rod, a line, a reel and a hook or lure. In C.S.D.93-13, HRL 734214, and HRL 559036 it appears that the article considered was only a rod without a reel, but that T.D.67-173 considered a rod as well as a reel.

Accordingly, since T.D.67-173 actually determined that the ultimate purchaser of a practically complete rod without a handle was the manufacturer of the finished rod, rather than being extended, T.D.67-173 was effectively overruled by C.S.D.93-13 and later rulings in which it was concluded that rod components do not undergo a substantial transformation by being assembled into a finished rod.

Similarly, in this case, we do not find that China is the last country where the fishing rod imported into the U.S. underwent a substantial transformation. Rather, it is our opinion that the fishing rod’s characteristics are primarily imparted at the time of manufacture in the U.S., as the rod blank is exported from the U.S.

In the length, diameter, and flexibility of the finished rod. Accordingly, consistent with HRL 735158 (country of origin of clock was country of manufacture of clock movement) and C.S.D.79-443 (knife remained product of the U.S. after handle was replaced in Japan), we find that the essential character of the finished rod is imparted by the rod blank.

Since the country of origin of the rod blank is the U.S., the country of origin of the finished rod imported into the U.S. is the U.S. This finding is consistent with Uniroyal, where the court considered whether the addition of an outsole in the U.S. to imported uppers lasted in Indonesia effected a substantial transformation of the uppers.

1. The court concluded that a substantial transformation of the upper had not occurred since the attachment of the outsole to the upper was a minor manufacturing or combining process which left the identity of the upper intact.
2. The upper was described as a substantially complete shoe and the manufacturing process taking place in the U.S.

required only a small fraction of the time and cost involved in producing the upper. Furthermore, in Uniroyal, the court determined that the completed upper was the very essence of the completed shoe. The concept of the “very essence” of a product was again applied by the court in National Juice Products v.

• United States, 628 F.
• Supp.978 (CIT 1986), where the court addressed each of the factors – name, character and use – in finding that no substantial transformation occurred in the production of retail orange juice products from manufacturing concentrate.
• The court found that the change in name from “concentrated orange juice for manufacturing” to “frozen concentrated orange juice” and “orange juice from concentrate” was not significant to a finding of substantial transformation.

Instead, the court stated that these names “merely refer to the same product, orange juice, at different stages of production.” Id. at 989. The court agreed with Customs that the imported manufacturing concentrate “imparts the essential character to the juice and makes it orange juice.

As in Uniroyal, the imported product is the very essence of the retail product.” The court found that the retail product in this case was essentially the juice concentrate derived in substantial part from foreign grown, harvested, and processed oranges. Although the addition of the water, orange essences, and oils to the orange juice concentrate made it suitable for retail sale, according to the court, this did not change the fundamental character or use of the product; it was still essentially the product of the juice of oranges.

As in Uniroyal and National Juice, it is our opinion that the rod blank imparts the essential character to the finished rod. However, unlike National Juice which required the finished juice to be marked with the countries from which the juice concentrate was derived, in this case, as in Uniroyal, there is only one component which imparts the essential character of the finished article.

Therefore, since the one essential component of the fishing rod is the rod blank, and the rod blank is of U.S.-origin the finished fishing rod will not be required to be marked pursuant to 19 U.S.C.1304. HOLDING: Based upon the information provided, as the rod blank is the essence of the finished fishing rod, it is our opinion that it is not substantially transformed as a result of the assembly operations performed in China.

Therefore, as the rod blank is of U.S. origin, the country of origin of the finished fishing rod will be the U.S., and, therefore, the finished fishing rod will not required to be marked with a country of origin pursuant to 19 CFR 134.32(m). A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to the entry documents filed at the time the goods are entered.

Who owns G Loomis rods?

About headquarters : SHIMANO INC. – Shimano Iron Works, the predecessor of Shimano Inc., was established in 1921 by Shozaburo Shimano in Sakai city, Osaka Japan. The first production was the bicycle single freewheel, required the greatest technical skill to produce. In 1951, the company’s name changed to Shimano Industrial Co., LTD.

1. We established Shimano American Corporation (current Shimano North America Holding, Inc.) as the first overseas sales office in 1965, while on the other hand Shimano Singapore Pte. Ltd.
2. As the first overseas manufacturing base in 1973.
3. In 1991, company name is changed to Shimano Inc.
4. Currently we have expanded our networks worldwide with consolidated subsidiaries.

Since Shimano’s founding, Headquarters have remained in Sakai, the city of Shimano’s birthplace. Shimano Inc. is headquarters and has a wide range of functions, including planning, development, design, manufacturing, and various other support functions for supplying bicycle components, fishing tackle and rowing equipment.

Are Hardy rods made in England?

Hardy – Hardy, based in Alnwick, England has been handcrafting innovative fly gear since its formation in 1872 and is still recognized as the finest fly rods and reels in the world. Hardy fly gear is for those who require the finest and will not settle for anything else. Learn more

Where are Okuma rods and reels made?

OKUMA FISHING TACKLE CO., LTD., since 1986, is a Fishing Rods manufacturer based in Taiwan. OKUMA FISHING strives to deliver the ultimate fishing experience to everyone, as well as create the best fishing reels and rods for our fellow anglers, which are lightweight and precise.

Where are Abu Garcia rods made?

Made in Sweden, the Abu Garcia® Ambassadeur® C4 Round Reel features our durable Carbon Matrix™ drag system which provides consistent pressure across the entire drag range. Available in three sizes: 4600, 5600 & 6600. Abu Garcia For Life!

Where is Daiwa rods made?

ABOUT US Daiwa’s has grown from small beginnings in Japan during the 1950’s as a reel maker, into a global fishing tackle brand, serving anglers of all disciplines around the world. A true manufacturer, they have production points in Japan, UK and throughout the Far East.

• Developing cutting edge technologies and creating trend setting rod a reel design, they also bring forward thinking development in luggage, accessories and apparel.
• Part of a European wide network the Daiwa Scandinavian office was set up in 2012 to handle sales and distribution in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway.

This office is also central to the development of tackle for Scandinavia as well as contributing to European programmes. Daiwa has a history of design and technology. In addition it has always maintained an emphasis on innovation and quality. The result is a long list of product features, design and materials that have become standards for the fishing tackle industry.

Where do they make St Croix rods?

Usa factory and factory store. St. Croix’s facility in Park Falls, Wisconsin manufactures our Legend, Avid, Mojo and other rod series. If you are in northern Wisconsin, be sure to sign up for a facility tour, or stop in to purchase your favorite rod right off the factory floor in our retail store.

Where are free spirit rods made?

HAND BUILT IN THE UK We have some of the best rod builders in the country with many years of experience assembling rods to our exact requirement.

Who manufactures major craft rods?

Who we are Our policy is simple—create high quality, affordable fishing rods and lures that allow anglers to maximize their fishing experience. This is how we’ve grown our business since 2001. Born in Japan, at Major Craft, we believe in continuously striving to improve our products and work with anglers directly to see how we can exceed their expectations when it comes to quality, price, and of course, performance.

Today, we are proud to be recognized as a leading manufacturer of rods and lures, and currently distribute to countries in Europe, Russia, Asia, Australia, and South America. Having finally come ashore to the U.S., we look forward to bringing the Major Craft experience to the long-held tradition of American fishing.

At Major Craft, our mission is to provide anglers all over the world with innovative, price-competitive fishing rods and lures that never compromise on craftsmanship. Major Craft is established in Japan by Tsugio Morio. As our first rods are launched, so is the now long-held tradition of providing fisherman with high quality products at an affordable price.

• The X-Ride, a rod based on 10 years of experience and feedback from anglers, is introduced, setting a new standard in the industry for how saltwater fishing rods should be designed.
• Having already provided anglers with rods that help to optimize their fishing experience, Major Craft enters the lure business, launching the Truzer.

This year also saw the launch of the MS-Z rod, the Truzer rod, as well as paved the way for the production of more lures, including our popular Jigpara. Major Craft America is born with a mission to combine the long-held tradition of American fishing with our tradition of providing affordable, high-quality rods and lures. Made from carbon materials imported from Japan, our rods are incomparable when it comes to price,design, functionality and overall quality. Whether you fish in fresh or saltwater, our lures combine modern fishing technology with the high level of detail and affordable price-point you’d expect from Major Craft.

Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh. Press the space key then arrow keys to make a selection.

: Who we are

Are Seeker rods made in USA?

Best of the Best since ’89 – The Seeker Fishing Rod Company is a “Made in America” brand where 100% of all Seeker composite blanks are built in-house. Each rod is taken from flat raw material and through a series of processes is turned into a fishing rod blank of ultra-high quality. : About Us