About The Time You Can Legally Buy Alcohol In Ohio – You can buy different alcoholic beverages in Ohio from Monday to Saturday from 5:30 AM until 1:00 AM (Class 1) or 5:30 AM until 2:30 AM (Class 2). We have categorized the window hours of alcohol sales in Ohio depending on the retailers’ permits. Class 1 Permit Holder: A-1, A-1c, A-2, B-1, B-2, B-4, B-5, C-1, C-2, C-2X, D-1, D-2, D-2X, D-3 when issued without a D-3A, D-3X, D-4, D-5H, D-5K, D-8, F, F-1, F-2, F-3, F-4, F-5, F-6, F-7, F-8, F-9, G, or I Class 2 Permit Holder: A-1A, D-3 when issued with a D-3A, D-4A, D-5, D-5A, D-5B, D-5C, D-5D, D-5E, D-5F, D-5G, D-5I, D-5J, D-5l, D-5m, D-5n, D-5o or D-7 In addition, you can legally buy alcohol in Ohio on Sundays if authorized.
Contents
- 1 When can you buy beer in Ohio on Sunday?
- 2 Can you buy beer at 19 in Ohio?
- 3 Can 18 year olds drink with parents in Ohio?
- 4 What are the blue laws in Ohio?
- 5 Is Ohio a dry state?
- 6 Can you serve alcohol at 19 in Ohio?
- 7 Can you buy non alcoholic beer under 21 in Ohio?
- 8 How old do you have to be to bartend in Ohio?
- 9 What are the drinking laws in Ohio?
When can you buy beer in Ohio on Sunday?
Sunday Sales of Intoxicating Liquor: 10:00 a.m. – midnight (Form 5-E)
Does Ohio sell beer in grocery stores?
In some control states, alcohol is only sold at designated package stores that are operated by government agencies. In Ohio, you can purchase beer, wine and liquor at grocery stores and other retail locations, but the state regulates the number of alcohol permits.
Can you buy beer at 19 in Ohio?
While the federal alcohol laws do not set a minimum legal drinking age or establish what constitutes underage, in 1984, Congress passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act which would essentially force all states to raise their minimum drinking age to 21.
Because the federal law allows states to make their own laws and regulations governing the sale of alcohol, the national minimum act could not tell the individual states that they were required to raise the drinking age, but instead, states that did not comply would lose federal highway funding, so all 50 states eventually gave in.
In Ohio, the legal minimum age to purchase alcohol and the minimum drinking age is 21. However, Ohio, along with 44 other states, allows minors (a person under the age of 21) to consume alcohol under some circumstances. Here, we will discuss the Ohio alcohol laws for minors and some underage drinking penalties.
Can 18 year olds drink with parents in Ohio?
Under Ohio law, children under the age of 21 may drink alcoholic beverages while under the supervision of their parents. This means one parent (or legal guardian) must give consent and be physically present while the child consumes alcohol.
Can you buy beer 24 hours in Ohio?
Final Thoughts – You can buy alcohol in Ohio as early as 5:30 AM and as late as 2:30 AM. However, depending on the permit class type, it can close as early as 1:30 AM. Sunday sales of liquor in Ohio are allowed, but there are permits to be secured to do so. In addition, home delivery is allowed depending on the permit and location. References:
- https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-4301.22
- https://com.ohio.gov/divisions-and-programs/liquor-control/new-permit-info/guides-and-resources/permit-class-types
Is alcohol sold on Sundays in Ohio?
Businesses can sell alcohol between 5:30 am to 2:30 am from Mondays to Saturdays. Sunday sales heavily depend on the location but with a special permit, alcohol may be sold from 10 pm to 1 am.
What is the most sold beer in Ohio?
Download Table Data
State | Most Popular Beer |
---|---|
New York | Budweiser |
North Carolina | Bud Light |
North Dakota | Fargo |
Ohio | Heineken |
What are the blue laws in Ohio?
Hamilton officials wrestled with Ohio’s ancient Sunday closing law in 1950s – Columns by Jim Blount Jim Blount regularly presents programs about the history of Hamilton and Butler County at the Hamilton Lane Library. His upcoming discussions include “” on Tuesday, January 10 and “” on Tuesday, February 14, These programs, which run from 2:00 – 3:00 p.m., are free and open to the public.
Reds and Dodgers moved 1889 baseball game moved to Fairfield Township to avoid Cincinnati enforcement Hamilton officials wrestled with Ohio’s ancient Sunday closing law in 1950s; legislation aimed at outlawing sin and anti-social behavior (The following is an edited version of columns written in 2008. They are from a searchable archive of Jim Blount’s history columns, dating back to 1988, and available at ) Compiled By Jim Blount
Imagine Sundays without shopping, sports events, entertainment, hunting and fishing and other amusements. That would be Ohio and other states in the era of blue laws, when, as recent as the 1960s, most retail stores were closed, and conducting business on Sunday could cause arrest and fines. Ohio’s blue laws predate statehood. In 1788 – 15 years before Ohio became a state – leaders of the Northwest Territory (eventually the states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota) adopted a blue law for the vast wilderness frontier.
To “set apart the first day of the week as a day of rest from common labor and pursuits,” the territorial edict “enjoined that all servile labors, works of charity and necessity excepted, be wholly abstained from on that day.” In 1809, Ohio legislators outlawed sin and anti-social behavior on Sundays, including “sporting, gambling, rioting, quarreling, hunting, horse racing, shooting or common labors,” except necessary work.
They were called blue laws because one or more of the regulations had been printed on blue paper. They had been adopted in American colonies, usually based on European antecedents. Provisions differed, shaped by the dominant religion in each colony and forcing smaller religious groups to obey the ideas of the majority.
Prohibitions varied from state to state, including bans on drinking, use of tobacco, singing, dancing, sports, hunting, shooting, card games, racing, gambling, playing musical instruments, musical and theatrical productions, and other “worldly activities.” Later restrictions ranged from hair cutting to vehicle transactions and most retail sales.
* * * * * The U.S. Congress resisted several attempts to enact federal blue laws. Sen. Henry William Blair of New Hampshire was responsible for two notable tries. In 1886, he introduced a National Sunday Rest Bill “to secure to the enjoyment of the first day of the week, commonly Sunday, as a day of rest, and to promote its observance as religious worship.” In 1888, Sen. Blair proposed a Lord’s Day Bill “to promote its observance as a Day of Religious Worship” that would ban “secular work, labor, or business” in interstate commerce, transportation, postal service, military drills that “interfere with or disturb the people in the enjoyment of the first day of the week,
- Or its observance as a day of religious worship.” Both Blair bills, incorporating language similar to state laws, died early deaths.
- State blue laws were pushed and sustained by temperance and prohibition advocates in the late 1800s and early 20th century.
- When religious arguments continued to fail, supporters promoted bans on Sunday business and amusement as “protection of the rights of the workingman,” a labor issue.
The debate continued in local governments, state legislatures and local, state and federal courts in the mid 20th century, the focus shifting to what could be sold and what type of retail businesses could operate on Sundays. At issue was what constituted “occupations of necessity or charity.” Ohio blue laws relied on local enforcement, which varied from place to place and time to time.
- Baseball teams periodically tested the law in the Hamilton area.
- In 1889, when a Hamilton minor league team sought a local field, it chose “grounds outside the city limits so as to play Sunday games” because the Ohio law that prohibited Sunday baseball “wasn’t enforced generally outside the cities.” The field was east of the Miami-Erie Canal (now Erie Highway), near Fair Avenue and High Street, because owners needed Sunday attendance to make a profit.
During a Sunday pre-season game, a Fairfield Township constable brought charges against the team, but a Butler County grand jury ignored the violation. Because they couldn’t play in Cincinnati, the 1889 Reds moved a Sunday, Aug.25, 1889, game to the east High Street field in Fairfield Township. More than 6,000 people overflowed the stands as the pennant-winning Brooklyn Dodgers took a 4-2 lead. The game was halted in the fourth inning on a complaint by a Hamilton man, a member of the Law and Order League.
- The lawyer and former state senator, who was a temperance advocate, enlisted Hamilton’s safety director and 18 policemen to arrest members of both teams.
- The players rode police wagons into Hamilton, faced the mayor and enhanced the city treasury by $159.30.
- Each culprit paid a $5 fine and $8.85 in costs.
* * * * * In 1952 two Cincinnati men opened a new business on the southern edge of Hamilton. Their enterprise on Dixie Highway, just south of Corwin Avenue, occupied a former roller skating rink. In the 1950s, Rink’s Bargain City was a popular and controversial retail attraction.
- The store – whose name derived from the skating rink – also became the center of the storm surrounding interpretation of Ohio’s blue laws.
- When Coleman Ullner and Hyman Ullner opened Rink’s Bargain City, most supermarkets, department stores and retail operations in and around Hamilton were closed Sundays.
There were few places to spend your money here on Sundays in the early 1950s. Rink’s challenged the Sunday closing law by remaining open seven days a week. Store owners faced repeated charges that they were violating Ohio blue laws. There had been periodic debates and court cases questioning the meaning of Ohio Sunday closing laws that originated in 1809.
- Coleman Ullner was charged in March 1955 with three violations – requiring employees to work on Sunday; personally operating a business that transacted business on Sunday; and president of a corporation operating a business on Sunday.
- The warrants were signed by Richard Koehler, then a Hamilton attorney, later a judge on the court of appeals.
April 19, 1955, Hamilton Municipal Judge Frank F. Wessel found Ullner guilty of the first two charges and dismissed the third. He paid a $25 fine and court costs on each of the two charges. His request for a new trial was denied. There would be more charges against Rink’s Bargain City during the next four years.
- Three additional warrants, also signed by Koehler, were pending April 19 when the judge ruled on the first three.
- A flurry of legal action followed alleged Sunday sales violations Sunday, Dec.21, 1958.
- Coleman Ullner requested and was granted a jury trial in Hamilton Municipal Court.
- He faced charges of operating a building for business on Sunday and requiring persons to work on Sunday that is “not of necessity or charity.” The charges followed a visit to Rink’s by Hamilton detectives.
They testified they had been ordered to check the store by Chief Albert Osborne. Ullner’s defense argued that the charges against Rink’s were discriminatory because it was the only store in Hamilton subject to prosecution. Also part of the defense was testimony from a Hamilton doctor who said he went to the store Dec.21 to buy a drug for a patient, a sick child.
- Ullner – a Navy pharmacist mate during World War II and a graduate of the Cincinnati College of Pharmacy – said drugs and medical supplies accounted for about 16% of Rink’s Sunday business.
- After deliberating four and a half hours, the 12-person jury found Ullner guilty on both charges.
- His December 1958 arrest came on the heels of the final phase of the April 1955 arrest.
Ullner had appealed, without success, through state courts to the Ohio Supreme Court. Undaunted, he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Dec.8, 1958, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the appeal “for want of a substantial federal question.” That decision didn’t end the Sunday sales debate in Ohio. In June 1964 – with Sunday operation questioned – Rink’s was sold to the Gray Drug Store chain. In April 1981, the discount department store chain was purchased by the Cook United Corp. of Cleveland. The original Rink’s Bargain City building was abandoned in 1972 and demolished in July 1998.
- A new store was built across the street and later at 4865 Dixie Hwy., Fairfield.
- In April 1984, Cook announced it would close 41 of its 94 stores, including the Fairfield location.
- Fifteen Rink’s stores were operating in the Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky areas then.
- Cook also had stores in six other states.
* * * * * Hamilton City Council faced the dilemma again in the late 1950s. Should the city enforce Ohio’s Sunday closing laws being challenged by a local merchant? Or, should council, through the city manager, instruct police to ignore the blue laws that had been on the state’s law books for at least 124 years.
While awaiting the U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Rink’s case, city council members were asking: Should the Hamilton enforce the blue laws, or ignore them? Were Sunday sales of drugs, groceries and gasoline legal? Was it necessary that restaurants, hotels and motels be open on Sundays? Rulings in state and federal courts on such questions had been indecisive and confusing.
Local authorities in Ohio and other states had to make independent interpretations. One local argument said as long as it was state law, Sunday closing should be enforced and violators arrested. Others said the Ohio legislature should solve the problem for Hamilton and other communities to achieve uniform statewide compliance.
- A councilman said state lawmakers should clarify the ambiguous law or abolish it.
- Questions included what merchandise and services could be offered on Sundays.
- A local merchants association told council it favored enforcement of the blue laws and asked why additional arrests had not been made at Rink’s Bargain City.
Council also was asked why the law should be enforced against Rink’s, but not against other Hamilton businesses open on Sundays. Finally, council agreed to enforce the law – against Rink’s and other local retailers. Council’s problem was more complicated than what to do about private businesses “not of necessity or charity” operating within the city on Sundays.
- Another wrinkle was what government services are “necessary” on Sundays – a vague area of the long-standing state law.
- There was no doubt about police and fire protection.
- But, in keeping with the spirit of the blue laws, Hamilton council ordered the municipal golf course, swimming pools and other recreation operations to be closed on Sundays.
That unpopular June 30, 1958, action didn’t last long. Council rescinded the closing order later that week before enforcement began on the next Sunday. At the July 2, 1958, meeting, Hamilton city council unanimously adopted a motion to refer the blue law questions to the Ohio General Assembly and Gov.C.
William O’Neill. Assistance was sought from three local legislators, State Sen. William Beckett and State Representatives Charles Jones and James Sexton. Council also asked other organizations to become involved – including chambers of commerce and bar associations – in urging state action. A newspaper report said councilmen had described the blue laws as “vague, outmoded, archaic, outdated and antiquated.” Council faced the problem again in January 1959 after the U.S.
Supreme Court decision and another arrest at Rink’s Bargain City. At the Jan.6, 1959, meeting of city council, City Manager Howard F. (Hack) Wilson submitted a list of more than 200 businesses and industries in Hamilton that were operating on Sunday in apparent violation of Ohio law.
- Council reacted by ordering that the city suspend enforcement of confusing Sunday sales limitations.
- But it would be several years before Ohio leaders resolved the problem.
- By the early 1970s, Ohio’s Sunday closing law were being ignored.
- Some supermarkets, furniture and hardware stores, department stores and other retail operations – formerly closed on Sundays – were operating seven days a week in Butler County and surrounding counties.
Ohio voters indicated support of the closing law in 1962. The Nov.6 ballot that year included a proposed state constitutional amendment regarding “the sale, processing or rendition of certain commodities, products and services on Sunday.” Backers of the amendment said: “This issue is as simple as this – if you want the convenience of having these items available on Sundays, vote YES.
- If you believe, for religious, moral or any other reasons, that they should not be available, vote NO.
- Neither the present 131-year-old blue law, nor any subsequent court decision, has ever made any of these items clearly legal for Sunday sale.
- All of them can be taken away from you at the discretion of any local enforcement official under pressure from any special interest group.” Items clarified in the amendment included “gas, electricity, telephone, telegraph, public means of transportation or any other public utility service or product; newspapers, other news publications, radio, television or other public communications service; household fuels; motor fuels and lubrications for automotive vehicles; prescriptions and proprietary drugs and household medical supplies; products used for personal hygiene and sanitation; milk, milk products, any food item or food product for human or animal consumption.” In Butler County, only 36.6% favored the amendment: 21,612 for and 37,376 against.
Statewide, 1.27 million voted yes and 1.69 million no. The blue laws remained in force. But that vote didn’t end the matter. Personal habits and preferences regarding the Sabbath changed. Sunday operations meant more jobs, more personal income and more tax revenue for local and state governments.
- During the next decade, blue laws became a low priority for law enforcement.
- Local communities – responsible for enforcing Ohio’s Sunday closure laws – said checking stores diverted police officers from other vital duties.
- Defending arrests in court consumed time and created additional government expense.
* * * * * Repeal of the Ohio laws came quietly in 1973 in the General Assembly. Rep. John A. Galbraith, a Republican from Maumee, was the prime sponsor of House Bill 59, aimed at ending the state’s Sunday blue laws. “There was virtually no opposition to Galbraith’s bill in the Agriculture, Conservation and Labor Committee,” said the Associated Press.
- Similar proposals have been rejected at several past sessions of the legislature.
- However, the development of big city discount houses, which attracted Sunday shoppers in droves over the past 10 years, helped soften opposition to Sunday transactions.
- In the same period,” the AP added, “court decisions made the laws virtually unenforceable.” June 20, 1973, the Ohio House of Representatives voted 62-32 in favor of HB59 to remove Sunday retail sales prohibitions.
Butler County’s two representatives split on the issue, William Donham of Middletown voting for repeal and Thomas Kindness of Hamilton opposing it. July 24 HB59 won support in the Ohio Senate, 25-6, with Donald E. (Buz) Lukens, representing Butler County, among the opponents.
- Gov. John Gilligan signed the measure Aug.22 and it became effective Nov.21, 1973.
- Unlike the debate in earlier decades, the demise of Ohio blue laws came without fanfare.
- Dominating the news in November 1973 were reports of worsening fuel shortages, revelations in the Watergate scandal and President Richard Nixon’s denial of those charges.
Nov.25, 1973, wasn’t memorable as the first Sunday without legal prohibitions on Sunday sales. Ironically, that night President Nixon, while addressing the nation, asked service stations, effective Dec.1, to stop selling gas between 9 p.m. Saturdays and 12:01 a.m. Jim Blount’s local history books are available in Hamilton at the Butler County Historical Society, 327 N. Second Street, and the Ross Avenue Barber Shop, 907 Ross Avenue. His history columns are posted periodically on the Lane Libraries web site and are also available via email subscription.
Can you drink at a bar at 18 in Ohio?
Underage Alcohol FAQ
At what age can a person legally drink alcoholic beverages, including beer, wine and liquor in Ohio? ANSWER : 21 years of age and older, except under the circumstances noted below. Under what circumstances can a person under 21 years old drink alcoholic beverages in Ohio? ANSWER :
If the person consumes the alcohol ‘in the presence’ of their parent, legal guardian, or a spouse who is over 21 years old, If the alcohol consumption is part of a recognized religious service, or The alcohol is prescribed for medical treatment by a doctor.
I have a son/daughter who is having a high school graduation party at our house. They and all of their friends are under 21 years old. Can they drink alcoholic beverages if they bring their own (BYOB) and it is not provided by me? ANSWER : NO, unless those attending the party bring a parent or legal guardian with them. Even if the underage guests BYOB you as the property owner, renter, occupier CANNOT allow them to consume alcohol on your premises. Regarding Question #3 above, What if the parents of the under age guests sign a letter giving them permission to drink alcohol at the party. Is this OK? ANSWER : NO; the only way the under age guests can drink alcohol at your house is if they have a parent, guardian or spouse 21 years old or over PHYSICALLY PRESENT with them at the party. I am over 21 years old and have some friends who are under 21. Can I legally purchase or provide beer or other alcoholic beverages for them? ANSWER : NO, unless you are the parent, guardian or spouse of those you are buying the alcohol for. Even under those circumstances the friends cannot drink the alcohol unless they are “in the presence of” a parent, legal guardian or spouse who is 21 or older. I own/work at a beverage convenience store. Am I responsible/liable for the sale of alcohol to an under age person? ANSWER : YES; the law requires you to take reasonable steps to verify the purchaser is 21 years of age or older. This will generally involve asking for and CAREFULLY checking a photo ID of the purchaser. If the ID happens to be forged or false you MAY escape legal liability for the sale, but it would depend upon the circumstances. What are the legal processes and penalties for violating the law concerning under age use of alcohol? ANSWER : If the under age user is under 18 years old they can be charged and prosecuted in Juvenile Court. If they are 18 but less than 21 years old they could be charged and prosecuted in Municipal Court. The same is true for those who purchase, provide, OR allow under age consumption on their property. Most violations of under age alcohol laws are Misdemeanors of the 1st degree carrying possible jail confinement of 6 months and/or a $1,000 fine. In addition to being charged with a crime could I also be sued if I violate an under age alcohol law? ANSWER : YES, for example if you host or allow a party at your house where alcohol is consumed by under age guests (REGARDLESS of who supplies the alcohol), you could be sued if any harm, injury, or death results from the alcohol consumption. Such a lawsuit could seek substantial monetary damages from you and any others who were involved in violating the law. If I am out at a restaurant with my son/daughter who is under 21 years old, can I legally order alcohol for them to drink? ANSWER : Legally, yes if you are physically present with them when they are drinking, BUT most restaurants will not allow underage patrons to have/drink alcohol on their premises as a matter of policy. Where can I get more information about Ohio laws that pertain to underage alcohol purchase, possession, use, or consumption? ANSWER : The Ohio Revised Code (ORC) contains these laws. Particularly, Ohio Revised Code Section 4301.69 contains most of the information concerning underage alcohol possession and use. Penalties are in Ohio Revised Code Section 4301.99. These and other related laws can be found on the Internet: Also, by typing “Parents Who Host, Lose the Most” into your Internet search engine you will find numerous websites, news releases and other information concerning underage alcohol consumption.
: Underage Alcohol FAQ
Can an 18 year old buy beer in Ohio?
Agents Remind Parents and Students of Ohio’s Alcohol Law Ahead of Graduation (Columbus) – Agents with the Ohio Investigative Unit (OIU) and the Ohio Division of Liquor Control are reminding high school students not to use drugs or alcohol during graduation celebrations.
It is illegal to provide a place for your child and his/her friends to drink in a “safe” environment. In fact, parents may not provide alcohol to children who are under 21, who are not their own, even in their own home with the other parents’ permission. Those convicted of providing alcohol to a person under 21 years of age face a maximum sentence of six months in jail and/or a $1,000 fine. It is illegal to purchase alcohol for anyone under 21. Anyone who purchases, sells or gives alcoholic beverages to underage individuals faces a $1,000 fine and/or up to six months in jail. If you are under 21 and are caught driving with a blood alcohol concentration of,02 percent or higher, a level that can be reached after just one or two drinks, you can be arrested. Punishment is suspension of your driver license for at least 90 days up to a maximum of two years, plus four points added to your driving record. Having an open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle is also illegal.
Carry-outs and drive-through establishments should be on alert for underage individuals attempting to purchase alcohol. The DOLC reminds permit holders and liquor agency stores of their responsibility to ensure they are not selling to or serving those under the age of 21.
- These celebrations can turn into tragedies when they’re combined with alcoholic beverages and can result in lifelong effects on teens, their families, and their communities,” said DOLC Superintendent Jim Canepa.
- Taking steps to stop the sale of alcoholic beverages to underage consumers can help keep teens and communities safe, sound, and secure.” The best way to prevent underage sales is for liquor permit holders and agency stores and their staff to thoroughly check the identification of all young people attempting to purchase alcoholic beverages.
Always ask for a photo ID and carefully compare it to the person seeking to make a purchase. If photo/ID can’t be provided, or if it’s not clear that the ID belongs to the person who presented it, it’s critical to refuse the sale. “Together, we must commit to making a safer Ohio, by stopping senseless tragedies associated with irresponsible and illegal underage alcohol consumption,” Commander Lockhart said.
When did you have to be 21 to drink in Ohio?
U.S. history of alcohol minimum purchase age by state Aspect of history The regarding minimum age for purchase have changed over time. In colonial America, generally speaking, there were no drinking ages, and alcohol consumption by young teenagers was common, even in taverns.
In post-Revolutionary America, such laxity gradually changed due to religious sentiments (as embodied in the temperance movement) and a growing recognition in the medical community about the dangers of alcohol. The more modern history is given in the table below. Unless otherwise noted, if different alcohol categories have different minimum purchase ages, the age listed below is set at the lowest age given (e.g.
if the purchase age is 18 for beer and 21 for wine or spirits, as was the case in several states, the age in the table will read as “18”, not “21”). In addition, the purchase age is not necessarily the same as the minimum age for consumption of alcoholic beverages, although they have often been the same.
- As one can see in the table below, there has been much volatility in the states’ drinking ages since the of in 1933.
- Shortly after the ratification of the in December, most states set their purchase ages at 21 since that was the at the time.
- Most of these limits remained constant until the early 1970s.
From 1969 to 1976, some 30 states lowered their purchase ages, generally to 18. This was primarily because the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18 in 1971 with the passing into law of the, Many states started to lower their minimum drinking age in response, most of this occurring in 1972 or 1973.
Twelve states kept their purchase ages at 21 since repeal of Prohibition and never changed them. From 1976 to 1983, several states voluntarily raised their purchase ages to 19 (or, less commonly, 20 or 21), in part to combat fatalities. In 1984, Congress passed the, which required states to raise their ages for purchase and public possession to 21 by October 1986 or lose 10% of their federal highway funds.
By mid-1988, all 50 states and the District of Columbia had raised their purchase ages to 21 (but not Puerto Rico, Guam, or the Virgin Islands, see Additional Notes below). and were the final two states to comply with the age 21 mandate. The current drinking age of 21 remains a point of contention among many Americans, because of it being higher than the (18 in most states) and higher than the drinking ages of most other countries.
- The National Minimum Drinking Age Act is also seen as a congressional sidestep of the,
- Although debates have not been highly publicized, a few states have proposed legislation to lower their drinking age, while Guam raised its drinking age to 21 in July 2010.
- Minimum legal drinking age as of 1969 (two years before the 26th Amendment was enacted in 1971): Minimum legal drinking age as of 1975 (when almost all states had their lowest age limit): Detail on dual age limits Both age limits apply for following states: : The legal drinking age is 19 for beer and wine, and 21 for liquor.,,,, and : The legal drinking age is 18 for beer and wine, and 21 for liquor.,,, and : The legal drinking age is 18 for 3.2% ABV beer, and 21 for beer stronger than 3.2% ABV, wine, and liquor.
Minimum legal drinking age as of 1983 (one year before the National Minimum Drinking Age Act was passed): Minimum age is 21 Minimum age is 20 Minimum age is 19 and 21 Minimum age is 19 Minimum age is 18 and 21 Minimum age is 18
State | (prior to 1919) | Post-Prohibition(after 1933) | 1970s / 26th Amendment(adopted in 1971) | 1980s / Drinking Age Act of 1984 | 21st century |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre 1881: None 1881: 21 (none with consent of parent) | 21 | 1975: Lowered to 19 | 1986: Raised to 21 | 21 (no one underage is allowed consumption Section 28-1) | |
N/A | 21 | 1970: Lowered to 19 | 1984: Raised to 21 with grandfather clause (if born before January 1, 1965) | 21 (unless the underage person is not on a licensed premises and the alcoholic beverage is provided by a parent, legal guardian, or spouse over the age of 21) | |
N/A | 21 | 1972: Lowered to 19 | 1985: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
Pre 1925: None 1925: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
Pre 1891: Regulated by municipality/county (common age was 16) 1891: 18 (statewide) | 1933: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 (except small amounts for religious ceremonies) | |
None | (Dec) 1945: 18: for 3.2% near-beer21: for wine and liquor | 18 for 3.2% beer; 21 for wine and liquor | Raised to 21 on Jul 31 1987 (with grandfather clause) | 21 | |
21 | 21 | 1972: Lowered to 18 | 1982: Raised to 19 1983: Raised to 20 1985: Raised to 21 | 21 (exemptions: (1) a person over age eighteen who is an employee or permit holder under section 30-90a and who possesses alcoholic liquor in the course of such person’s employment or business, (2) a minor who possesses alcoholic liquor on the order of a practicing physician, or (3) a minor who possesses alcoholic liquor while accompanied by a parent, guardian or spouse of the minor, who has attained the age of twenty-one. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to burden a person’s exercise of religion under section 3 of article first of the Constitution of the state in violation of subsection (a) of section 52-571b. | |
N/A | 21 | 1972: Lowered to 20 | 1984: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
N/A | 18: for beer and wine 21: for liquor | 18: for beer and wine 21: for liquor | 1986: Raised to 21 with, | 21 | |
N/A | 21 | 1976: Lowered to 18 1980: 19 | 1986: Raised to 21 with grandfather clause | 21 | |
N/A | 21 | 1972: Lowered to 18 | 1982: Raised to 19 1985: Raised to 20 1986: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
N/A | 21 | 1972: Lowered to 18 | 1986: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
N/A | 20: for beer 21: for wine and liquor | 1972: Lowered to 19 (all) | 1987: Raised to 21 in 1987 (Apr 11) with | 21 | |
1872: (none with written consent of parent) | pre 1961: Age of majority 1961: Raised to 21 | 1973: Lowered to 19: for beer and wine21: for liquor | 1980: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
N/A | Post-1934: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
N/A | 21 | 1972: Lowered to 19 in 1972 (Jul 1) 1973: Lowered to 18 in 1973 (Jul 1) 1978: Raised to 19 in 1978 (Jul 1) | 1986: Raised to 21 in 1986 (Jul 1) with, | 21 | |
N/A | 1949: 18: for beer and wine with less than 4% 21: for liquor | 18: for beer and wine with less than 4% 21: for beer and wine with 4% or more 21: for liquor | 1985: Raised to 21 | 21 (However, anyone under 21 may consume cereal malt beverages with parental supervision on their own property) | |
N/A | 1938: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
None | 18 | 18 | 1987: Raised to 21 de jure in 1987, but de facto age was still 18 until 1995 due to a sale loophole.1995: De facto age raised to 21 in 1995 when loophole was closed.1996: In 1996, briefly lowered by Louisiana Supreme Court to 18 until it reversed its decision, raising to 21 three months later. Other exceptions still remain. | 21 ( Exceptions to state law include ):
|
|
N/A | 21 1969: Lowered to 20 | 1972: Lowered to 18 1977: Raised to 20 | 1985: Raised to 21 | 21 (however minors can drink at home with parental supervision) | |
N/A | 21 | 1974: Lowered to 18: for beer and wine21: for liquor | 1982: Raised to 21 with grandfather clause for those born June 30, 1964, or earlier | 21 (however anyone can drink when parents, spouses, teachers are present) | |
N/A | 21 | 1973: Lowered to 18 1979: Raised to 20 in 1979 (Apr 16) | Raised to 21 in 1985 | 21 | |
N/A | 21 | 1972: Lowered to 18 in 1972 (Jan 1) | 1978: Raised to 19 in 1978 (Dec 3) 1978: Raised to 21 in 1978 (Dec 21), 18 days later. First state to raise age to 21 since it was lowered | 21 | |
N/A | 21 | 1973: Lowered to 18 (June 1) 1976: Raised to 19 (Sept 1) First state to raise age after lowering. | 1986: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
? | 1966: 18: for beer and wine21: for liquor (alcohol not legalized until 1966) | 21 | Raised to 21 in 1986 | 21 | |
? | 1945: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
? | 21 | 1971: Lowered to 19 1973: Lowered to 18 1979: Raised to 19 | 1987: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
? | 21 1969: Lowered to 20 | 1972: Lowered to 19 | 1980: Raised to 20 1985: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
? | 1933: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
? | 21 | 1973: Lowered to 18 1979: Raised to 20 | 1985: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
Before 1880: None Post-1880: 18 (penalties only against businesses) | 21 | 1973: Lowered to 18 | 1980: Raised to 19 1983: Raised to 21 | 21 (As of February 22, 2021, there are no longer any penalties for underage drinking besides warnings.) | |
? | 1934: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
18 (16 before 1896) | Initially 21 immediately after Prohibition, then reduced to 18 four months later. | 18 | 1982: Raised to 19 in 1982 (Dec) 1985: Raised to 21 in 1985 (Dec) | 21 | |
? | 18 | 18: for beer and wine 21: for liquor | 1983: 19: for beer and wine 21: for liquor 1986: Raised to 21 in 1986 (Sep 1) | 21 | |
? | 1936: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
? | 1933: 16 1935: 18: for 3.2% ABW beer21: for beer stronger than 3.2% ABW, wine and liquor | 18: for 3.2% ABW beer21: for beer stronger than 3.2% ABW, wine and liquor | 1982 (Aug.19 to Oct.1) : 19: for 3.2% ABW beer 21: for beer stronger than 3.2% ABW, wine and liquor 1982 (From Oct.1) : 19: beer21: wine and liquor 1988: 21 | 21 (However, anyone can drink with parents or legal-age spouse) | |
? | Men: 21 Women: 18: 3.2% ABW beer21: for beer stronger than 3.2% ABW, wine and liquor | 1976: Lowered to 18 (for 3.2% ABW beer) for both sexes in 1976 (Dec) Last state to lower the drinking age. | 1983: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
? | 1933: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
? | 1935: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
? | 21 | 1970: Lowered to 18 | 1980: Raised to 19 1981: Raised to 20 1984: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
21 | 1935: 18: for beer and wine21: for liquor | 18 | 1984: 19: for beer and wine 21: for liquor 1985: Raised to 20 1986: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
? | 1934: 21 (all) 1939: Lowered to 18: for 3.2% beerRaised to 19: for 3.2% beer | 1972: 18: for 3.2% beer;21: for wine and liquor | 1984: 19: for beer and wine21: for liquor 1988: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
Pre 1881: None 1881: 21 | 21 1964: Lowered to 18 | 1979: Raised to 19 | 1984: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
Pre 1909: 21None (with written permission of parent or guardian) Post 1909: 21 | 21 | 1973: Lowered to 18 | 1981: Raised to 19 1986: Raised to 21 in 1986 (Sep 1) | Parent consent | |
? | 1935: 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
? | 21 | 1971: Lowered to 18 | 1986: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
? | 21 | 1974: Lowered to 18: for beer and wine(21: for liquor remained) | 1981: Raised to 19 for off-premises consumption 1983: Raised to 19 (all beer) 1985: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
since 1877 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
? | 18: for beer and wine 21: for liquor | 1972: Lowered to 18 (all) | 1983: Raised to 19(& 21 for non-residents) 1986: Raised to 21 | 21 | |
1839–1866: 18: for wine and liquorNone: for beer Post-1866: 21 (all) | 18: for beer21: for wine and spirits 1957: 21: for residents of bordering states with age limit 21.1963: Raised to 21 (off-premises beer sales, remained 18 for on-premises). | 1972: Lowered to 18 (all) in 1972 (Mar) 1977: Border state restriction lifted. | 1984: Raised to 19 1986: Raised to 21 (September 1, 1986) | 21 (however anyone can drink when a parent, guardian or spouse over 21 is present) | |
N/A | 21 | 1973: Lowered to 19 | 1988: Raised to 21 in 1988 (Jul 1) Last state to raise de jure drinking age to 21 | 21 | |
N/A | N/A | N/A | 21 | 21 | |
– | – | N/A | 21 | 21 | |
N/A | 18 | 18 | Kept at 18despite highway fundingpenalty under the National Minimum Drinking Age Act. | 18 | |
N/A | N/A | N/A | 18 | 18 | |
N/A | 21 | 18 | 18 | Raised to 21 in 2010 |
Can a minor sit at a bar in Ohio?
MINORS ALLOWED ON PREMISE? There are no state laws regulating the admittance of underage persons to establishments. CAN PARENTS SERVE? It is unlawful to serve or sell alcohol to anyone under the age of 21.
Is BYOB legal in Ohio?
Is Byob Legal Ohio Ohio`s alcohol laws make it illegal to operate a boat under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs. This also includes water skiing, personal watercraft or similar equipment. It is illegal to have an open container of alcohol on public property, regardless of age.
Ohio views public ownership as very, very broad. A court may consider places to be visible, easily accessible and accessible to the public to be public property. It is illegal to transport previously opened liquor containers in a vehicle other than in the trunk. As Ohio liquor license attorneys, our team often gets this question.
Many restaurateurs want to avoid the cost and complications of an Ohio liquor license and naturally want to know whether or not they can offer BYOB (Bring Your Own Booze or Beverage) to their customers under Ohio law. Other business owners are from neighboring states that have permissive laws related to BYOB.
Simply put, BYOB is NOT legal in Ohio. To arrive at this answer, however, one must examine a patchwork of different laws and judicial opinions. Therefore, under the revised Ohio Code, it is illegal to sell, keep, or possess beer, intoxicating liquor, or liquor for sale without a license. Ohio`s alcohol laws prohibit ordering distilled spirits over the Internet.
It is also illegal to bring more than one liter of alcohol into Ohio per person 21 and older. As consumers bring more into the state, they must physically visit one of the state`s monopoly liquor stores. There, buyers have to do paperwork and pay taxes on alcohol.
Illegal possession or consumption of alcohol by minors is punishable by a fine of up to $250 and/or imprisonment for up to 30 days. Minors are not adults. That is, people 17 years of age or younger. This also means that sports fans are not legally allowed to drive a tailgate in a public car park. It is illegal to sell alcohol to people under the age of 21 or to drunk people.
Also, bars can`t give away free beer. People under the age of 21 can drink in the presence of a parent or guardian. They can also drink with their adult spouse. Finally, they are allowed to drink for religious, educational or medical purposes established by law.
It is also illegal to allow a person under the age of 21 to stay in their home or property while having alcohol. Of course, this does not include your own offspring. There are no legal provisions to ensure the safety of deportees. It is illegal for anyone 21 years of age or older to drive with a blood alcohol level of 0.08% or higher.
For those under 21, including adults, the figure is 0.02%. It would be 0.00%, except for certain facts. If you`ve made it this far, you probably understand how tense and dangerous it can be to try to serve alcohol or allow BYOB in Ohio without a liquor license.
- Our team of Ohio liquor license attorneys have years of experience helping businesses of all sizes get the necessary licenses for their Ohio bars and restaurants.
- Instead of risking civil fines or worse, call us today at 419-900-0955 to discuss your options for legally selling alcohol in Ohio.
- The tickets were then returned to the bartender, who picked up the guest`s stored beverages for a fee of $1.25 per beer and $1.75 per other alcoholic beverage.
For example, a guest would bring a pack of six beers and receive six tickets. If the guest wanted a beer, he would exchange a ticket and pay $1.25 and receive one of his beers. The facility operated under this BYOB policy from January 2012 to September 2012, when the DOPS conducted a raid.
- The raid was the result of the ODPS` ongoing investigation into the GoGo.
- The investigation focused on several covert operations carried out by ODPS agents.
- During one of the covert operations, when two agents entered the GoGo, an employee informed the officers that if they wanted to drink alcohol, they would have to provide their own.
The employee explained the BYOB policy to the officers, who went to buy a case of beer. As a result of this search, the complainant was charged with four counts of illegal sale and four counts of manager of a place. The defendant was convicted on all counts and sentenced to 180 days in jail (suspended for 150 days), $500 and costs, as well as the ability to post a $1,000 bond or a one-year discount on illegal selling fees.
- He was fined $250 and charged the expense of a court custodian.
- In general, it`s best to consider any public consumption of alcohol that is illegal in Ohio unless the state specifically allows it.
- The process of obtaining this licence is what we have called obtaining a liquor licence.
- Section 4301.58 of the Revised Ohio Code describes a variety of acts that are prohibited without authorization.
These include the following: “I think it really normalizes alcohol around us and also increases the risk of people drinking alcohol in a high-risk way,” Clouner said. “The perception is the reality and the perception is always that people consume larger amounts of alcohol.” “It`s a difficult balance.
We`re looking at that with all these changes we`re making to Ohio law,” Evans said. “I don`t think you`re going to see big, big, big changes because public health is respected.” As the law makes clear, a section 4303 licence is a general defence to any charge under that section. However, without a license, anyone who sells, provides, or gives liquor in a public place is violating Ohio law.
In addition, the law states that “everything. Circumvention device”, this law constitutes an illicit sale – even if it is not “sold” in the traditional sense. Similarly, in Bishop v. Carpenter`s Local Union #126, 1st Dist. C-070591, 2008-Ohio-2846, a union held its annual picnic in a park that included picnic areas, rides and other facilities.
- As part of the activity, the syndicate purchased 30 half-barrels of beer which, according to the contract with the supplier, were to be made available to participants free of charge.
- Union members and their families had free admission to the event, the union distributed many free tickets before the event, and the public could attend for an entrance fee.
After admission, participants received free beer and food, as well as free use of park rides and other recreational facilities. The union and beer supplier were sued after a participant was involved in a fatal car accident after leaving the spade. Grocery stores, pharmacies and other authorized retailers may sell beer and wine.
However, only state-owned monopoly stores sell distilled spirits.I. Minimum age II. More alcohol laws in Ohio III. Resources IV. Seeking legal advice (B) Every person, personally or through the employee, the employee`s representative or employee, who does not hold an A, B, C, D, E, F, G, I or S licence issued by the Ministry authorizing the sale of beer, intoxicating spirits or liquor, or who is not an agent or employee of the Ministry or the Commissioner of Taxation authorized to sell that beer, Intoxicating liquor or liquor may sell, store or possess beer, intoxicating liquor or liquor for sale to persons other than those authorized under Chapter 4301.
and 4303. of the revised Code for Purchasing Intoxicating Beer or Liquor or for Selling Liquor in Retail Stores. This Division does not apply to the sale or possession of low-alcohol beverages. Not surprisingly, lawyers strongly advise against taking a field sobriety test.
- Taking it can never help exonerate a person.
- So lawyers say, never take one.
- Learn a lot more about Never Take a Field Sobriety Test Say DUI Lawyers.
- Ershner praised new state laws such as one that allows “designated outdoor refreshment areas” where people can carry open drinks outside, and an exception for “pedal pubs,” a nickname for quadricycle where people travel and drink at the same time.
Ohio`s alcohol laws are subject to change. Thus, county and local laws. You can contradict yourself. Plus, they can be confusing. That`s why lawyers study law for years. It`s not about doing it yourself. Never rely on this website. Not even on another site.
The stakes are too high. In response to the applicant`s allegation that the union, in violation of the R.C.4301.58 beer to those who paid to participate in the pic-, the First District explained: “Those who paid an entrance fee for the pic-did not buy alcohol; They paid to participate in the pic-, which included food and use of the park`s many recreational facilities.
: Is Byob Legal Ohio
What happens if you get caught drinking under 21 in Ohio?
Underage Drinking In Ohio Under Age Drinking Cases In Columbus And Central Ohio Underage alcohol consumption and/or possession is one of the most common criminal charges for young people in Ohio. Knowing that it’s common, however, does not help that young person facing legal consequences and a tarnished record.
- A good Columbus underage drinking lawyer who practices in central Ohio may help you avoid or reduce those consequences and protect your record.
- Enforcement Of Ohio Under Age Drinking Laws Law enforcement has little tolerance for underage drinking.
- If you are under 21 and get caught possessing or consuming alcohol in public, expect the law to be enforced, even on college campuses.
For example, there is increased police presence and strict enforcement of underage drinking laws on the days of football games at The Ohio State University. Other universities have similar programs on their campuses which include prosecution for underage drinking offenses that occur in the homes of sororities and fraternities.
- An isolated incident due to a lapse in judgment can easily become a criminal case with significant consequences.
- Charges For Under Age Drinking In Columbus And Central Ohio Underage drinking is known by multiple labels in Ohio, including “underage alcohol consumption”, “underage alcohol possession”, “prohibition”, “underage intoxication”, “offense involving underage persons”, and “certain acts prohibited”.
Ohio law generally prohibits people under age 21 from purchasing, possessing, or consuming alcohol. Ohio law also makes it illegal for underage persons to be under the influence of alcohol in a public place. Cities throughout Ohio also have similar laws prohibiting the purchase, possession and consumption of alcohol for people under 21.
Penalties For Under Age Drinking Violations In Columbus And Central Ohio Strategies For Ohio Under Age Drinking Charges Representation For Under Age Drinking Cases In Columbus And Central Ohio
Ohio law classifies underage drinking as a first degree misdemeanor. The potential sentence for an underage drinking conviction includes a potential jail term up to six months, a fine up to $1,000 plus court costs, alcohol counseling, community service, and probation.
- In addition, a conviction for underage drinking is a public criminal record which may affect a person’s education and employment opportunities.There are essentially two strategies for defending a client charged with underage drinking in Columbus and central Ohio, and we pursue both strategies.
- First, we investigate the availability of a diversion program.
If a client is accepted into a diversion program and completes it successfully, the case is dismissed, and the records for the case can be sealed (expunged). Second, we obtain the evidence the prosecuting attorney intends to introduce, evaluate the strength of that evidence, and pursue potential defenses to the charge.
If a diversion program is not an option, or if a client opts not to participate in a diversion program, we plead Not Guilty and defend against the underage drinking charge in the court process. The court process may include pretrial hearings, hearings on motions to suppress evidence, and a trial. In all cases, we seek the best possible outcome for underage drinking charges from both a legal perspective and a treatment perspective.The Dominy Law Firm is focused on criminal defense.
Since 1997, we have represented many clients, including several students, charged with underage drinking offenses in Franklin County, Delaware County, mayor’s courts, and other courts in the central Ohio area. In most cases, we are able to get the underage drinking charges dismissed or reduced, and we are often able to get the records for the case sealed (expunged).
- To see what clients say about the Dominy Law Firm, please see the page.
- Our firm charge flat fees for representation in underage drinking cases, so you will know the total fee before representation begins.
- If you would like to discuss how we can help with an underage drinking case, submit a or call us at 614-717-1177 to arrange for a free consultation.
: Underage Drinking In Ohio
Is Ohio a dry state?
There are 32 dry states : Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee,
Can you serve alcohol at 19 in Ohio?
The age requirement to serve alcohol at a bar or restaurant has been lowered in Ohio in the new year. Under the new law, servers can be as young as 18 years old while serving alcohol. Before, the minimum age requirement was 19 years old.
Can you buy non alcoholic beer under 21 in Ohio?
Can you drink non alcoholic beer when driving? – It’s best to avoid non alcoholic beer when driving, even though its alcohol content is negligible. In most states, the authorities view non alcoholic peers the same way they do alcoholic beverages. Don’t worry, a bottle or two of non alcoholic beer isn’t likely to affect your driving.
- This may cause a lapse in concentration, which is likely to increase the risks of an accident.
- Non alcoholic beers are also subject to open container laws.
- So, the cops are very likely to pull you over if they see that you are consuming non alcoholic beer when driving.
- Last but not the least, you should know that it’s illegal for under-21 individuals to drive when their blood alcohol levels are 0.02% or higher.
: Can You Buy Non Alcoholic Beer Under 21?
How old do you have to be to bartend in Ohio?
Minimum Age To Serve Alcoholic Beverages In Ohio: – The state of Ohio has somewhat complex laws concerning age and selling/ serving alcohol. We have provided all the details below. If you are seeking to become specifically a bartender, you must be 21.
18-year-olds may sell beer, wine, mixed beverages or spirituous liquor in sealed containers ONLY19-year-olds may handle beer, wine, mixed beverages or spirituous liquor in open containers when acting in the capacity of a waiter/ waitress
19-year-olds may sell beer only across a bar
One must be 21 years of age to sell wine, mixed beverages, or spirituous liquor across a bar
** A person of any age, employed by a permit holder, may handle beer, wine, mixed beverages and spirituous liquor in connection with stocking, bagging, bussing tables, etc.
Why is there no wine sales on Sunday in Ohio?
Intoxicating Liquor (Wine, Low-proof mixed beverages and Spirituous Liquor) – Ohio Revised Code Section 4303.182 A liquor permit holder is required to have a D-6 permit to sell intoxicating liquor on Sunday. The D-6 extends to Sunday the sales privileges for intoxicating liquor that the holder has Monday through Saturday as long as there are no local option elections that impact permit privileges.
What are the drinking laws in Ohio?
Agents Remind Parents and Students of Ohio’s Alcohol Law Ahead of Graduation (Columbus) – Agents with the Ohio Investigative Unit (OIU) and the Ohio Division of Liquor Control are reminding high school students not to use drugs or alcohol during graduation celebrations.
It is illegal to provide a place for your child and his/her friends to drink in a “safe” environment. In fact, parents may not provide alcohol to children who are under 21, who are not their own, even in their own home with the other parents’ permission. Those convicted of providing alcohol to a person under 21 years of age face a maximum sentence of six months in jail and/or a $1,000 fine. It is illegal to purchase alcohol for anyone under 21. Anyone who purchases, sells or gives alcoholic beverages to underage individuals faces a $1,000 fine and/or up to six months in jail. If you are under 21 and are caught driving with a blood alcohol concentration of,02 percent or higher, a level that can be reached after just one or two drinks, you can be arrested. Punishment is suspension of your driver license for at least 90 days up to a maximum of two years, plus four points added to your driving record. Having an open container of alcohol in a motor vehicle is also illegal.
Carry-outs and drive-through establishments should be on alert for underage individuals attempting to purchase alcohol. The DOLC reminds permit holders and liquor agency stores of their responsibility to ensure they are not selling to or serving those under the age of 21.
- These celebrations can turn into tragedies when they’re combined with alcoholic beverages and can result in lifelong effects on teens, their families, and their communities,” said DOLC Superintendent Jim Canepa.
- Taking steps to stop the sale of alcoholic beverages to underage consumers can help keep teens and communities safe, sound, and secure.” The best way to prevent underage sales is for liquor permit holders and agency stores and their staff to thoroughly check the identification of all young people attempting to purchase alcoholic beverages.
Always ask for a photo ID and carefully compare it to the person seeking to make a purchase. If photo/ID can’t be provided, or if it’s not clear that the ID belongs to the person who presented it, it’s critical to refuse the sale. “Together, we must commit to making a safer Ohio, by stopping senseless tragedies associated with irresponsible and illegal underage alcohol consumption,” Commander Lockhart said.
What are the blue laws in Ohio?
Hamilton officials wrestled with Ohio’s ancient Sunday closing law in 1950s – Columns by Jim Blount Jim Blount regularly presents programs about the history of Hamilton and Butler County at the Hamilton Lane Library. His upcoming discussions include “” on Tuesday, January 10 and “” on Tuesday, February 14, These programs, which run from 2:00 – 3:00 p.m., are free and open to the public.
Reds and Dodgers moved 1889 baseball game moved to Fairfield Township to avoid Cincinnati enforcement Hamilton officials wrestled with Ohio’s ancient Sunday closing law in 1950s; legislation aimed at outlawing sin and anti-social behavior (The following is an edited version of columns written in 2008. They are from a searchable archive of Jim Blount’s history columns, dating back to 1988, and available at ) Compiled By Jim Blount
Imagine Sundays without shopping, sports events, entertainment, hunting and fishing and other amusements. That would be Ohio and other states in the era of blue laws, when, as recent as the 1960s, most retail stores were closed, and conducting business on Sunday could cause arrest and fines. Ohio’s blue laws predate statehood. In 1788 – 15 years before Ohio became a state – leaders of the Northwest Territory (eventually the states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin and part of Minnesota) adopted a blue law for the vast wilderness frontier.
To “set apart the first day of the week as a day of rest from common labor and pursuits,” the territorial edict “enjoined that all servile labors, works of charity and necessity excepted, be wholly abstained from on that day.” In 1809, Ohio legislators outlawed sin and anti-social behavior on Sundays, including “sporting, gambling, rioting, quarreling, hunting, horse racing, shooting or common labors,” except necessary work.
They were called blue laws because one or more of the regulations had been printed on blue paper. They had been adopted in American colonies, usually based on European antecedents. Provisions differed, shaped by the dominant religion in each colony and forcing smaller religious groups to obey the ideas of the majority.
Prohibitions varied from state to state, including bans on drinking, use of tobacco, singing, dancing, sports, hunting, shooting, card games, racing, gambling, playing musical instruments, musical and theatrical productions, and other “worldly activities.” Later restrictions ranged from hair cutting to vehicle transactions and most retail sales.
* * * * * The U.S. Congress resisted several attempts to enact federal blue laws. Sen. Henry William Blair of New Hampshire was responsible for two notable tries. In 1886, he introduced a National Sunday Rest Bill “to secure to the enjoyment of the first day of the week, commonly Sunday, as a day of rest, and to promote its observance as religious worship.” In 1888, Sen. Blair proposed a Lord’s Day Bill “to promote its observance as a Day of Religious Worship” that would ban “secular work, labor, or business” in interstate commerce, transportation, postal service, military drills that “interfere with or disturb the people in the enjoyment of the first day of the week,
- Or its observance as a day of religious worship.” Both Blair bills, incorporating language similar to state laws, died early deaths.
- State blue laws were pushed and sustained by temperance and prohibition advocates in the late 1800s and early 20th century.
- When religious arguments continued to fail, supporters promoted bans on Sunday business and amusement as “protection of the rights of the workingman,” a labor issue.
The debate continued in local governments, state legislatures and local, state and federal courts in the mid 20th century, the focus shifting to what could be sold and what type of retail businesses could operate on Sundays. At issue was what constituted “occupations of necessity or charity.” Ohio blue laws relied on local enforcement, which varied from place to place and time to time.
- Baseball teams periodically tested the law in the Hamilton area.
- In 1889, when a Hamilton minor league team sought a local field, it chose “grounds outside the city limits so as to play Sunday games” because the Ohio law that prohibited Sunday baseball “wasn’t enforced generally outside the cities.” The field was east of the Miami-Erie Canal (now Erie Highway), near Fair Avenue and High Street, because owners needed Sunday attendance to make a profit.
During a Sunday pre-season game, a Fairfield Township constable brought charges against the team, but a Butler County grand jury ignored the violation. Because they couldn’t play in Cincinnati, the 1889 Reds moved a Sunday, Aug.25, 1889, game to the east High Street field in Fairfield Township. More than 6,000 people overflowed the stands as the pennant-winning Brooklyn Dodgers took a 4-2 lead. The game was halted in the fourth inning on a complaint by a Hamilton man, a member of the Law and Order League.
- The lawyer and former state senator, who was a temperance advocate, enlisted Hamilton’s safety director and 18 policemen to arrest members of both teams.
- The players rode police wagons into Hamilton, faced the mayor and enhanced the city treasury by $159.30.
- Each culprit paid a $5 fine and $8.85 in costs.
* * * * * In 1952 two Cincinnati men opened a new business on the southern edge of Hamilton. Their enterprise on Dixie Highway, just south of Corwin Avenue, occupied a former roller skating rink. In the 1950s, Rink’s Bargain City was a popular and controversial retail attraction.
The store – whose name derived from the skating rink – also became the center of the storm surrounding interpretation of Ohio’s blue laws. When Coleman Ullner and Hyman Ullner opened Rink’s Bargain City, most supermarkets, department stores and retail operations in and around Hamilton were closed Sundays.
There were few places to spend your money here on Sundays in the early 1950s. Rink’s challenged the Sunday closing law by remaining open seven days a week. Store owners faced repeated charges that they were violating Ohio blue laws. There had been periodic debates and court cases questioning the meaning of Ohio Sunday closing laws that originated in 1809.
Coleman Ullner was charged in March 1955 with three violations – requiring employees to work on Sunday; personally operating a business that transacted business on Sunday; and president of a corporation operating a business on Sunday. The warrants were signed by Richard Koehler, then a Hamilton attorney, later a judge on the court of appeals.
April 19, 1955, Hamilton Municipal Judge Frank F. Wessel found Ullner guilty of the first two charges and dismissed the third. He paid a $25 fine and court costs on each of the two charges. His request for a new trial was denied. There would be more charges against Rink’s Bargain City during the next four years.
- Three additional warrants, also signed by Koehler, were pending April 19 when the judge ruled on the first three.
- A flurry of legal action followed alleged Sunday sales violations Sunday, Dec.21, 1958.
- Coleman Ullner requested and was granted a jury trial in Hamilton Municipal Court.
- He faced charges of operating a building for business on Sunday and requiring persons to work on Sunday that is “not of necessity or charity.” The charges followed a visit to Rink’s by Hamilton detectives.
They testified they had been ordered to check the store by Chief Albert Osborne. Ullner’s defense argued that the charges against Rink’s were discriminatory because it was the only store in Hamilton subject to prosecution. Also part of the defense was testimony from a Hamilton doctor who said he went to the store Dec.21 to buy a drug for a patient, a sick child.
- Ullner – a Navy pharmacist mate during World War II and a graduate of the Cincinnati College of Pharmacy – said drugs and medical supplies accounted for about 16% of Rink’s Sunday business.
- After deliberating four and a half hours, the 12-person jury found Ullner guilty on both charges.
- His December 1958 arrest came on the heels of the final phase of the April 1955 arrest.
Ullner had appealed, without success, through state courts to the Ohio Supreme Court. Undaunted, he appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Dec.8, 1958, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the appeal “for want of a substantial federal question.” That decision didn’t end the Sunday sales debate in Ohio. In June 1964 – with Sunday operation questioned – Rink’s was sold to the Gray Drug Store chain. In April 1981, the discount department store chain was purchased by the Cook United Corp. of Cleveland. The original Rink’s Bargain City building was abandoned in 1972 and demolished in July 1998.
- A new store was built across the street and later at 4865 Dixie Hwy., Fairfield.
- In April 1984, Cook announced it would close 41 of its 94 stores, including the Fairfield location.
- Fifteen Rink’s stores were operating in the Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky areas then.
- Cook also had stores in six other states.
* * * * * Hamilton City Council faced the dilemma again in the late 1950s. Should the city enforce Ohio’s Sunday closing laws being challenged by a local merchant? Or, should council, through the city manager, instruct police to ignore the blue laws that had been on the state’s law books for at least 124 years.
While awaiting the U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Rink’s case, city council members were asking: Should the Hamilton enforce the blue laws, or ignore them? Were Sunday sales of drugs, groceries and gasoline legal? Was it necessary that restaurants, hotels and motels be open on Sundays? Rulings in state and federal courts on such questions had been indecisive and confusing.
Local authorities in Ohio and other states had to make independent interpretations. One local argument said as long as it was state law, Sunday closing should be enforced and violators arrested. Others said the Ohio legislature should solve the problem for Hamilton and other communities to achieve uniform statewide compliance.
- A councilman said state lawmakers should clarify the ambiguous law or abolish it.
- Questions included what merchandise and services could be offered on Sundays.
- A local merchants association told council it favored enforcement of the blue laws and asked why additional arrests had not been made at Rink’s Bargain City.
Council also was asked why the law should be enforced against Rink’s, but not against other Hamilton businesses open on Sundays. Finally, council agreed to enforce the law – against Rink’s and other local retailers. Council’s problem was more complicated than what to do about private businesses “not of necessity or charity” operating within the city on Sundays.
Another wrinkle was what government services are “necessary” on Sundays – a vague area of the long-standing state law. There was no doubt about police and fire protection. But, in keeping with the spirit of the blue laws, Hamilton council ordered the municipal golf course, swimming pools and other recreation operations to be closed on Sundays.
That unpopular June 30, 1958, action didn’t last long. Council rescinded the closing order later that week before enforcement began on the next Sunday. At the July 2, 1958, meeting, Hamilton city council unanimously adopted a motion to refer the blue law questions to the Ohio General Assembly and Gov.C.
William O’Neill. Assistance was sought from three local legislators, State Sen. William Beckett and State Representatives Charles Jones and James Sexton. Council also asked other organizations to become involved – including chambers of commerce and bar associations – in urging state action. A newspaper report said councilmen had described the blue laws as “vague, outmoded, archaic, outdated and antiquated.” Council faced the problem again in January 1959 after the U.S.
Supreme Court decision and another arrest at Rink’s Bargain City. At the Jan.6, 1959, meeting of city council, City Manager Howard F. (Hack) Wilson submitted a list of more than 200 businesses and industries in Hamilton that were operating on Sunday in apparent violation of Ohio law.
Council reacted by ordering that the city suspend enforcement of confusing Sunday sales limitations. But it would be several years before Ohio leaders resolved the problem. * * * * * By the early 1970s, Ohio’s Sunday closing law were being ignored. Some supermarkets, furniture and hardware stores, department stores and other retail operations – formerly closed on Sundays – were operating seven days a week in Butler County and surrounding counties.
Ohio voters indicated support of the closing law in 1962. The Nov.6 ballot that year included a proposed state constitutional amendment regarding “the sale, processing or rendition of certain commodities, products and services on Sunday.” Backers of the amendment said: “This issue is as simple as this – if you want the convenience of having these items available on Sundays, vote YES.
If you believe, for religious, moral or any other reasons, that they should not be available, vote NO. Neither the present 131-year-old blue law, nor any subsequent court decision, has ever made any of these items clearly legal for Sunday sale. All of them can be taken away from you at the discretion of any local enforcement official under pressure from any special interest group.” Items clarified in the amendment included “gas, electricity, telephone, telegraph, public means of transportation or any other public utility service or product; newspapers, other news publications, radio, television or other public communications service; household fuels; motor fuels and lubrications for automotive vehicles; prescriptions and proprietary drugs and household medical supplies; products used for personal hygiene and sanitation; milk, milk products, any food item or food product for human or animal consumption.” In Butler County, only 36.6% favored the amendment: 21,612 for and 37,376 against.
Statewide, 1.27 million voted yes and 1.69 million no. The blue laws remained in force. But that vote didn’t end the matter. Personal habits and preferences regarding the Sabbath changed. Sunday operations meant more jobs, more personal income and more tax revenue for local and state governments.
During the next decade, blue laws became a low priority for law enforcement. Local communities – responsible for enforcing Ohio’s Sunday closure laws – said checking stores diverted police officers from other vital duties. Defending arrests in court consumed time and created additional government expense.
* * * * * Repeal of the Ohio laws came quietly in 1973 in the General Assembly. Rep. John A. Galbraith, a Republican from Maumee, was the prime sponsor of House Bill 59, aimed at ending the state’s Sunday blue laws. “There was virtually no opposition to Galbraith’s bill in the Agriculture, Conservation and Labor Committee,” said the Associated Press.
- Similar proposals have been rejected at several past sessions of the legislature.
- However, the development of big city discount houses, which attracted Sunday shoppers in droves over the past 10 years, helped soften opposition to Sunday transactions.
- In the same period,” the AP added, “court decisions made the laws virtually unenforceable.” June 20, 1973, the Ohio House of Representatives voted 62-32 in favor of HB59 to remove Sunday retail sales prohibitions.
Butler County’s two representatives split on the issue, William Donham of Middletown voting for repeal and Thomas Kindness of Hamilton opposing it. July 24 HB59 won support in the Ohio Senate, 25-6, with Donald E. (Buz) Lukens, representing Butler County, among the opponents.
- Gov. John Gilligan signed the measure Aug.22 and it became effective Nov.21, 1973.
- Unlike the debate in earlier decades, the demise of Ohio blue laws came without fanfare.
- Dominating the news in November 1973 were reports of worsening fuel shortages, revelations in the Watergate scandal and President Richard Nixon’s denial of those charges.
Nov.25, 1973, wasn’t memorable as the first Sunday without legal prohibitions on Sunday sales. Ironically, that night President Nixon, while addressing the nation, asked service stations, effective Dec.1, to stop selling gas between 9 p.m. Saturdays and 12:01 a.m. Jim Blount’s local history books are available in Hamilton at the Butler County Historical Society, 327 N. Second Street, and the Ross Avenue Barber Shop, 907 Ross Avenue. His history columns are posted periodically on the Lane Libraries web site and are also available via email subscription.
Can you buy alcohol on Sunday in Michigan?
FAQs on Michigan Beer, Wine & Spirits Sales –
- What are the policies regarding the sale of alcohol on Sundays in Michigan?
- In Michigan, people can purchase alcohol on-premise and off-premise from 7 AM to 2 AM on Monday to Saturday, and from noon to 2 AM on Sunday.
- What are the hours retailers can sell alcohol?
Retailers can sell on-premise and off-premise from 7 AM to 2 AM on Monday to Saturday and from noon to 2 AM on Sunday. However, retailers can obtain a special license extension and sell alcohol from 7 AM on Sundays. What are the alcohol laws in Michigan? Michigan state law forbids the sale of alcohol to people under 21, and it also forbids the sale of alcohol to an intoxicated person.
Anyone caught breaking this law can earn a fine of $1,000 for a first offense and much steeper fines for subsequent offenses. No retailer can sponsor a contest that requires alcohol, and they can’t use alcohol as a possible prize. The state has a monopoly on the wholesale sales of distilled spirits and mandates a minimum price for all alcohol sales.
Grocery and convenience stores can sell beer and wine, as can the gas stations in most Michigan counties, except for Wayne County, where alcohol is not sold at gas stations. Also, the state prohibits the sale of alcohol after 9 PM on December 24 and all of December 25.
- Do they sell liquor, wine, or beer in grocery stores in Michigan?
- Michigan’s grocery and convenience stores can sell beer, wine, and liquor.
- Do they sell liquor, wine, or beer in gas stations in Michigan?
- Provided they have an alcohol sales permit, gas stations in Michigan can sell beer, wine, and liquor
- What is the alcohol excise tax in Michigan?
- Michigan enforces a strict excise tax on alcohol as follows:
- Beer Tax – $0.20/gallon
- Wine Tax – $0.51/gallon
- Distilled Spirits Tax – Michigan has a monopoly on the wholesale of distilled spirits, dictating the market price, and no additional tax is charged.
The Federal alcohol excise tax is also included in the price of the alcoholic beverage sold in Michigan, as follows:
- Beer Federal Excise Tax – $18.00/31-gallon barrel, or $0.05 per 12-oz can
- Wine Federal Excise Tax – $1.07 to $3.4/gallon; $0.21 to $0.67/750ml bottle
- Distilled Spirits Federal Excise Tax – $13.5/proof gallon or $2.14/750ml 80-proof bottle (40% ABV).
Are you a consumer looking for info on when and where you can buy alcohol in Michigan? The answers provided below should help you better understand how things work within the state and the applicable laws.
Does Sheetz sell alcohol in Ohio?
Where can I find a Sheetz store that serves alcohol? – Sheetz stores that sell alcohol are only available at select locations located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia, and Maryland in addition to North Carolina. You can locate a location near you, which serves alcohol by visiting Sheetz’s mobile or website.